The Wake Wood (2011, Review) Hammer Films

wakewoodposter

“What goes on in Wake Wood is not for everyone.”

Wake Wood is the latest Hammer outing in association with Vertigo Films and with the backing of the Irish Film Council. Does it have the same ingredients, resonance and capacity to stand the test of time as did the Hammer productions of the 60s and 70s? The answer here is a definitive “yes”. The film follows a lot of traditional threads in storytelling of the twisted and macabre – which in its heyday, Hammer did well, but was apparent elsewhere in ghost stories from the previous centuries neatly catapulted into the modern era. The theme of Necromancy (bringing back the dead) was acutely relied upon in The Black Death (another British horror from this year set in the 14th century), as a means of getting across the dangers of putting emotional need above godlessness and natural regenerative order.

A couple, Patrick and Louise (Aiden Gillen, Eva Birthistle) are suffering a loss: their daughter has been horrifically mauled by a savage dog , the loss compounded by Louise’s inability to have any more children. To get away, recover and rebuild they move and start again. An Irish village welcomes them, regardless of the fact that both the couple and the villagers have a secret. The ‘us ‘and ‘them’ wariness doesn’t last when it becomes apparent that Louise especially cannot let go of the memory of her daughter and carries around with her an almost tangible sense of loss and yearning.

Arthur (Timothy Spall), the self-appointed village head (in a role not dissimilar to that played by Christopher Lee in 1973′s The Wicker Man), offers the prospect of three days with their child to the couple after Louise stumbles across a weird human regeneration and recycling process being carried out in Arthur’s back yard. They would be forever tied to the village thereafter but this seems no big deal – Patrick is the village vet being groomed to take over Arthur’s place here (Patrick performs a Caesarean on a cow early into the first act ), and Louise is the local pharmacist (who smells a rat when a customer wants to cash in a prescription nearly 12 months out of date).

The sympathies lie here with both couple and villagers – neither are wicked or warped. The couple are grieving and the villagers have found a way of preserving themselves. It would have been very easy and predictable to have had the residents mad or backward, as in Wicker Man, American Werewolf in London, The Shuttered Room, Straw Dogs, Deliverance and countless others. This is a refreshing turn, where the boundaries of good and bad are not necessarily so clear cut, or easily definable.

The deal involves the use of a dead body (provided by the husband of the village caution litmus paper Peggy O’Shea – played magnificently by Ruth McCabe). In one of the best scenes of the film, Peggy holds a candle to the eyes of Louise and Patrick with her dead husband laid on a bed behind her and sees something especially in Louise that is ‘not quite right.’ It would appear that the permission or go ahead would be needed from Peggy as loved one of deceased for the ritual to be green lighted. Arthur disagrees with Peggy – mostly probably due to the even functionality of Patrick’s role as newcomer vet and therefore the attendant need to have him happy.

In the only deeply unfeasible aspect of the film, Patrick and Louise go to their daughter’s grave (she wasn’t cremated), to get some real organic matter for the necromancy to work on. A fresh cadaver is used to rebirth an old one and this process is watched by the rest of the village in a scene not dissimilar to those we would see in old Denis Wheatly adaptations such as The Devil Rides Out.

Happiness with their newly reborn is short lived. The secret that the couple kept to themselves becomes manifest in the behaviour of their daughter Alice, which has to be the strongest and creepiest malevolent child performance since Damien in the original Omen. Alice senses all the villagers that were or are against her and knows of her own mortality: she sets about a reckoning all of her own and it becomes clear to even her doting parents that something must be done. All moral and territorial boundaries have not been adhered to, if not broken down completely.

The ending is a little shlock and straight out of Carrie and Friday 13th part II – which is a shame for a movie that is a slow burning evolving story that gradually draws the viewer into an old fashioned tale of genuine unease without resorting to the shock tactics of new modern horror. A very worthy treat and a more than interesting addition to the annals of Hammer, certainly enough to greatly anticipate The Resident – due for release in 2011. Another era dawns…

I Spit on Your Grave (1978, Blu-ray/DVD Review) 101 Films


Director: Meir Zarchi

Cast: Camille Keaton, Aron Tabor, Richard Pace, Anthony Nichols

101 Films / Region-B (Blu-ray) &  PAL R2 (DVD) / Unrated / 1.78:1 Anamorphic Widescreen / Dolby Digital 5.1, Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo and Dolby Digital 1.0 /

Blu-ray/DVD Combo extras:

  • UK Exclusive video interview with Director Meir Zarchi
  • Trailers
  • TV Spots
  • Radio Spots
  • Sleeve and poster Image Gallery
  • Image Gallery from Director’s Personal Collection
  • Reviews & Articles from Around the World
  • In-Depth Essay -What Do People Think & Say About ISoYG
  • DVD Monthly Interview
  • Filmographies
  • Audio commentary by Director Meir Zarchi & Film Critic Joe Bob Briggs
  • ISoYG Poster
  • 24 page booklet
  • This film has such a reputation that it was given the status of ‘video nasty.’ In the UK, the 1984 Video Recordings Act made sure that certain titles were taken off the shelves in order to protect the moral well-being of minors whose parents may subject them to lurid subject matter. I Spit on Your Grave along with Driller Killer and The Burning were among the tabooed titles and were only available for a long time on the black market. The film is the epitome of revenge movies, but with a calmer and more sensible retrospect on the heightened atmosphere surrounding the banning of this and other films of the same era and genre. What was all the fuss about, and indeed does it still deserve some respect as an exploitation classic and notoriety as a rape/revenge movie?

    Well, yes. It is still a worthy film and with some very powerful scenes but there are a lot of references to other woks here that did not get banned, or had as much of a fuss made about them. The camerawork is a little unsteady and the acting has that staged appeal typical of exploitation style with emphasized movements and actions. An aspiring novelist – a New Yorker is going to the woods to get some peace and inspiration. Of course there is the usual bent of city-slicker coming to a sticky end in the countryside at the mercies of those unsophisticated locals which has been done in The Shuttered Room, Deliverance, and of course, Straw Dogs. Jennifer looks every minute a seventies woman, wafer thin, wispy and whimsical, played by Buster Keaton’s granddaughter Camile Keaton. Just as soon as she arrives she is gawked at by the neighbourhood trash who wonders ‘if good-looking girls shit too…’ They come to the conclusion that “New York broads are loaded and fuck a lot” (obviously, if Sex and The City is anything to go by) so they start on their campaign to tease and taunt the foxy out-of-towner.

    There is a long shot of Jennifer on a boat in the middle of a peaceful lake which vaguely looks like the final sequence in Friday 13th. It more than likely started here.  ”She’s a wild one” one of them says as they circle her in a speedboat completely shattering any hopes of getting any writing done that day. The action comes in thick and fast though as the men inflict two lots of rape on this woman, not just the one – she is also beaten/raped in her own home. The idea of this is considerably more sickening than the reality as one of the actors in the group of rapists “Matthew” – played by Richard Pace, cannot act to save his life and looks awkward in his own skin. One of the rapes looks just plain silly with the guy tossing his body about all over the place.

    One of the worst aspects is the humiliation, taunting and tearing up of the girl’s work. There is not just anger at women here, there is genuine envy for sophistication of life and spirit that Jennifer symbolises. The beating comes after the rape, just to put the boot in and to make sure Jennifer really gets the message how disgusting she is for allowing all of this to happen. She is left – but then Mathew has to go back to finish her – not doing so ensures the second act of this exploitation classic.

    The fact that there is no police involvement at all is very perplexing. It would have been a far better film had Jennifer sought legitimate justice first, become a victim of the system to compound her anger and then sought cold, cold revenge a while later. As it is, intending to kill her, upon finding out she was not dead, they would have just raped her again or killed her, getting rid of any trace she was there. Jennifer is powerful again turning on those that hurt her and driving herself mad into the bargain.

    The castration scene is overblown but very bloody, the scene with Jennifer in the speedboat coming at her victim with a hatchet is very effective – a modern day Boudicca. There is a seduction scene with Jennifer in a long white nightdress, looks very nice. Very 1970s Penthouse, so does the shack that Jennifer has hired for the duration. Her universe looks enticing indeed, pre and post rape. It is probably this that gives her the confidence to enact a roaring rampage of revenge. The wife of one of the victims goes looking for him at the petrol station where Jennifer was first taunted: “my husband never fucking disappears on me – he’s not that kind of a man.” Little does she know that he has disappeared for good – and that he was that kind of a man.

    This flick has a lot going for it and anyone who collects films of this era and genre should have it in their collection as it is part of our censorship past. It is a better film than most of those out of the 1970s and there are elements in here that you would find in Cape Fear, Blair Witch, The Last Exorcism, Friday the 13th andThe Evil Dead, in fact any film that has isolationism in the woods as an element compounding ‘fish out of water’ fear. Exploitation films were cheaply made and looked it – but the ideas they yielded were used for major ventures that would often not have the heart or moral core of films like this.  I Spit on Your Grave, 1978 has had a great rep for a long time, which speaks volumes for its cred.

    Video Nasties: The Definitive Guide (2010, DVD Review) Nucleus Films


    Nucleus Films

    This 13 hour extravaganza covers not only the ‘Nasties’ themselves – but the socio-political landscape within which these 72 titles were banned in Britain. The first noteworthy aspect of this compendium is the fair and even treatment of the concept: it is dealt with in both a fun and serious way. This of course is appropriate as the subject matter is exploitation and horror movies of the ’70s and ’80s and a particular response to them as the knee jerk impact of that response – which was dangerous, fraudulent, unfair and anti-civil libertarian. When analyzing the content in the second and third discs, the commentators do not shirk from telling it just as it is – some of these movies were given notoriety and would not have stood on their own without it.

    To say that Video Nasties: The Definitive Guide is a good and worthy watch is putting it mildly. There is both scope and duration on its side: a slice of British cultural history seen from all perspectives imaginable. The beauty being that we are dealing here with the period 1979-1984 which means that, with the exception of a particularly fervent political and moral crusader (Mary Whitehouse), all involved, or commentating are alive, well and young enough in age or spirit to give an honest and colourful two pennies worth.

    The three DVDs content is split thusly: the first with the introductory documentary ‘Video Nasties: Moral Panic, Censorship and Videotape,’ by Jake West.  It wisely starts with the nostalgia surrounding the key elements of home entertainment – the video cassette recorder and the size and exclusivity of it: the war between Betamax and VHS Pal. Every street corner suddenly had a retail outlet that either sold/rented video, or had it in a corner obscurely part of the rest of the shop. One of the commentators humorously recalls a concern near where he lived that was owned by an Indian guy with a mad beard – the shop was thereafter referred to as ‘Rasputin’s.’ It is these light hearted asides that even s the balance for the seriously heavy duty response to visceral movies of this era either good or bad.  The very same ‘moral panic’ which surrounded the comic books of the 1950s was at play here and the initial move was to have a great deal of titles – with particularly lurid art work on the cassette cover being banned under the terms of the Obscene Publications Act and subject to the removal via the weight and authority of the Director for Public Prosecutions.

    Hoards of policemen Britain wide were seizing copies of films, watching and then burning them. Ludicrously enough, some titles fell under this fevered behaviour such as Samuel Fuller’s The Big Red One thinking that it was a porn movie, along with The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas – a semi musical starring Dolly Parton.  To this day, those concerned with inciting this madness are quite unrepentant; in spite of the evidence in this tight and entertaining doc. Peter Kruger (an ironic name if ever there was one), the Head of the Obscene Publications Squad, Scotland Yard, seems to feel that these films, which include titles such as The Killer Nun, could be ‘capable of corrupting and depraving.’ Whereas the director Christopher Smith (Creek, The Black Death) remembers feeling a sense of injustice as a 13 year old.  Note also that one of the 72 films is The Evil Dead – its then twenty-something director Sam Raimi now a mainstream director of high level Hollywood respectability.

    The cultural commentators point rightly to the fact that these types of movies – regardless of their cinematic merit, or lack of it, permanently altered the cultural landscape in cinema, changing styles, methods of delivery and providing us with some pretty memorable advertising.  The people in charge of banning them had no idea what they were doing. They also hurt the independent retailer immeasurably: the process of self-regulation would have cost the video shop owner £500 per film. There was no way that was ever likely to happen.  The Video Recordings Act happened instead. Some of the so-called evidence supporting the case for the eventual introduction of the Video Recordings Act (the Act of Parliament that followed in 1984) beggars belief. Sir Graham  Bright – the MP responsible for bringing the Act in front of the House as a Private Member’s Bill – is on television and on record as saying ‘research will show that not only proves that these films effect people, but dogs as well.’ Worse still is the discovery that this Act was never validated by the European Commission rendering it defunct.

    The documentary surrounding the history is met with some pretty entertaining trailers of titles on disc 1 including a section devoted to ‘naughties’ such as Gwendoline and Fantasm. Watching the section devoted to distributors brand images was an endurance test in wave after wave of pure nostalgia: all identities seemed to be constructed of font of neon or space invader-inspired typeface with polymoog synthesiser incidental music. This visual tome has been made with the aficionado in mind: the trailers and films are listed alphabetically with accompanying material to help ‘completists’ with the search for the original deal. Compilation material like this does not grow on trees. The makers of this box set know its audience and will undoubtedly tick some boxes. There’s even a foxy goth girl to introduce some of the items as well as being a scantily clad permanent feature on the index navigation pages. Though from a female and perfectionist perspective the fact that she does make reading from an autocue a little too obvious shouldn’t distract a healthy male cult fan whatsoever.

    For anyone interested in the exploitation and cult genres in a serious way, the second and third discs introduce -to the uninitiated- some important names and faces in the academic and commentary world of this area of study.  They consist of authors: Stephen Thrower (Nightmare USA), Marc Morris (Co-Author of ‘The Art of the Nasty’), Allan Bryce (Editor of Dark Side magazine), Kim Newman (Nightmare Movies), academics: Julian Petley (Professor of Screen Media & Journalism Brunel University, England), Xavier Mendik (Director of Cine-Excess and Curator of the Cult Movie Archive, Brunel University) among others who put across fair analysis of the films and in doing so often mention other titles when dealing with genre, director output or influences. Most of the contributors in this section have written prolifically on cult movies and are all mentioned in the comprehensive list of contributors. Note also a web address to go to for purchases for purists, though there is plenty to get the average enthusiast hurtling towards the Amazon.com search window without checking this out.

    For an erudite and fun sense of history and cultural commentary on the sorts of movies we know and love, this is excellent company for a winter weekend.

    Vanishing Point (1971, DVD Review)

    vanishingpointdvdDirector: Richard C. Sarafian

    Cast: Barry Newman, Cleavon Little

    Fox Home Entertainment / NTSC Region 1 / Rated R / 1.85:1 Anamorphic Widescreen / Audio Track 1: English, Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo, Audio Track 2: English, Dolby Digital 1.0, Audio Track 3: Spanish, Dolby Digital 1.0, Audio Track 4: French, Dolby Digital 1.0 / Subtitles: English, Spanish / 99 minutes / BUY ON DVD or BLU-RAY FROM HKFLIX

    ——————————–

    This is a well loved cult classic car chase movie idolized by Tarantino and mentioned at length during girl talk in his movie Death Proof. It deserves its cult status as it is undoubtedly cool and has a very laid back hero (with demons) pitching against police across state lines to reach his destination. Most of the critiques of this movie in mainstream don’t give it more than a two star rating, but it remains a classic loved by filmmakers and fans alike. Why the contradiction? Firstly, it lacks coherence: the reason the iconic hero Kowalski (played by Barry Newman) needs to make the journey from Denver to San Francisco in a white 1970 Dodge Challenger in fifteen hours is unclear. A motive and a prize at the end would make this a better movie.

    We are given reasoning piecemeal throughout by putting together the range of flashbacks Kowalski has: boredom, contempt for authority, the need for freedom and just plain the need to get it over and done with asap. He takes pep pills at Denver to help him get through it. In this respect it functions just as much as a snapshot of hippie thoughts and culture as it does a car chase film. It is vacant and minimalist. This probably explains the title. The landscapes that provide the backdrop are mostly desert where cars vanish into long stretches of highway and become dots in the distance. Also, we never see Kowalski make it to his final destination. The ending sees the Dodge Challenger freeze, and effectively vanish, the Sunday after the beginning of his journey. Where we are timewise is presented across our screen intermittently.

    No one Kowalski encounters has any depth or resonance to them. His company in the film and his journey are a rag bag of strange characters: a snake catcher, naked blondes on motorcycles, hippies that help Kowalski escape and foil the police in pursuit. At one point the naked girl on the cycle offers herself unconditionally to Kowalski, something that could only happen in a hippie context. He refuses though, he would rather have a smoke. She gets him a Marlboro soft pack and presents them to him at the same time as showing him a montage of pictures of his escapades. The press have been charting his progress in the papers and have been looking into his past.

    Mostly the relationship between Kowalski and the blind Super Soul DJ (played by Cleavon Little), give this film some heart as this is what pre-empts the ongoing fan base that gathers from the intermittent reports of Kowalski’s progress Super Soul puts on the airwaves. This gives the film momentum also as the police themselves are listening to the same radio broadcasts. Super Soul refers to Kowalski as ‘the last American hero.’ Kowalski himself is a tortured hero but doesn’t show it externally.

    He is an ex- racing driver, marine and an ex-cop. We know he is a good man as once (told to us in flashback) he rescued a hippy chick from being raped in the back of a car by a fellow police officer. His girlfriend (blonde surfer girl) disappeared in a tragic surf incident, the only remnants of her a board washed up on a beach. But his exterior hides all of this and remains the epitome of unflappable cool. This makes the character of Kowalski interesting and worthy of our attention. There is more to him than meets the eye.

    The soundtrack helps this film enormously as the DJ puts on music to accompany Kowalski on his road trip. When the DJ himself isn’t responsible, music from the period that fits is in the background. It is one of the film’s better features. The DJ (as egger-on of the pursued) technique is also used to great effect in the cult classic street gang flick The Warriors. The Super Soul DJ is assaulted by a police officer and thugs giving out racial abuse at one point during the film which serves as a further piece of counter culture of the early seventies threaded through the film.

    Vanishing Point has been labelled with some justification as an essay in Existentialism. There is no specific rhyme or reason to Kowalski, only a need to be free. The journey itself, and more specifically doing it his own way in his own self appointed time, is reason in itself and proof that man is – or should be — sufficiently without restraint to carry this out. However, the credence in this philosophy falls down when considering that Kowalski, by following this credo, may and possibly does lose his life by it. The film is unclear as to whether or not he accepts this and is happy to do so. He smiles at the point before vanishing, so maybe he is ready to die by how he has lived.

    The UK version had Charlotte Rampling being picked up as a hitchhiker who offers him weed that he takes only to find her vanished the following morning. It would have been in keeping with the themes of the film but wouldn’t be in character for the main lead. It just isn’t cool. Not to Kowalski. He doesn’t need it. It is good that this was left out. Besides, it was supposed to symbolise Kowalski’s proximity to death and be an allegorical device. Barry Newman claimed that the Americans just would not have been able to get it.